I mean, there is just no mystery about this. It's why she's being selected. And, just yesterday, the President said he wants nine justices on the Supreme Court because he wants to challenge mail-in voting, and he wants the Supreme Court to vote on that. How do you think Amy Coney Barrett is going to vote? He's putting her on the Court to help him win reelection in a political sense and in a very specific sense, to throw out votes he doesn't want. I mean, you know, it's sometimes important to see what's right in front of you, and what's right in front of you is why Amy Coney Barrett is the leading candidate for this post.
1. abortion case1 and case2 and case3 and case4 and case5
gallup poll and marist poll
2. police violence case1 and goes back years case 2 and case 3 guyger v noor and case4
3. slow to inform on police violence case1 and case2 and case3 and case4
4. fake hate crime and did not update
5. guns universal background checks and charleston loophole case1 and case2 and case3 and case4 and case5 and case6
discredited polling
obama era background check but not true
allowing guests to mislead
6. noticing immigration enforcement activities that were also done under obama
fixated on story and took a while to finally admit polish doctor had recent brushes with the law that made him a target of deportation
transferring money from fema to ice
7. claiming illegal border crossers who seek asylum did not actually break the law by crossing the border without permission and case2 and case3 and case4 and
8. conflate legal and illegal case1 and case2 and case3 and case4 and case5 and case6 and
wrongly accusing nielsen of lying about child separation
reality check kids misleadingly downplayed reports that 2,000 non-citizens who committed homicides were deported in 2018
reality check misleading on kids in cages and why illegal immigrant families separated at border
rc tried to undermine trump by incorrectly suggesting bush was president when ana illegal immigrant murdered police officers even though it was five years into obama's presidency during a time when sanctuary cities might have helped him remain
9. suggested it was unprecedented to separate from parents even though obama admin also sometimes did it
10. hyped trump admin pursuing the issue of birth certificate fraud even though not a new issue, past admins also did it
11. never told viewers he was a homicide suspect being extradited to mexico
12. claim legal immigrants separated again and again and
10. weekend promoted film misleadingly accusing gop of becoming motivated to enact "voter suppression" in response to obama being elected, and repeating claims of nefarious activity by republicans in georgia over and over and over and
11. making highly questionable claims that illegals have a lower crime rate than citizens and case2 and case3 and case4
other cnn making dubious claims that illegals commit less crime
12. blaming trump for illegals rushing the border without informing that even during obama admin rejected 80 percent of asylum claims from central american countries
blaming trump for illegals crossing in desert even though they also did during obama admin
13. lost 1500 children
14. cp5 again and again
15 transgender bathroom law in nc again and again and again
even though he did not and substantial evidence of guilty
7. no mention of tara reade
8. repeated duckworth's claim that trump spoke about "dead Confederates" at rushmore
9. both weekday and weekend cheered on cocky teacher who tried to correct a letter from trump white house even though it turned she was the one who was not aware that proper writing is different for the white house
10 abrams not allowed at gov mansion
11. misleading video that made it look like a cop kicked a man in the head like a football while he was on ground
12 repeated a false and frequently used dem talking point that mcconnell declared his top goal to was to make obama one-term prez as soon as elected
if break the law, you're separated
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
November 6
1. washpost
2. nat review
3. wash examiner
4. cis1 study
5. cis2 factcheck
6. cis 2017 some studies are misleading because combine those are free with those who are incarcerated and unable escape -- and the herald cites and examiner cites
7. case management more expensive, and focus on selective number
8. sept 2018 cis debunk study
9. jan 2019 43 pct dont show up
10. wall st absentia confusing
11. many asylum seekers never apply
12. sessions stats
13. credible hearing
14. removal proceedings
15. first caravan april asylum ***
16. publicized and called themselves
17.detention facilities
18. dna cases
19. cases
20. cases
highly misleading and failed to shed light on the critical issues like the large percentage who never apply for asylum or who have their cases rejected, and who then cannot be easily removed from the country