Banana New York: State Disbars Rudy Giuliani from Practicing Law

Nick Kangadis | July 2, 2024

The ‘Banana Republic’ of New York has struck again. This time the state has targeted a man they once praised as “America’s Mayor” following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division disbarred former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani over his protestations of the results of the 2020 presidential election.

And there it is. It’s not because he necessarily did anything illegal, it’s because Giuliani had the audacity of supporting former President Donald Trump.

That’s the truth. Let’s get real. Can we live in reality for a minute?

The Post Millennial reported that ruling stated the following:

The disciplinary charges stem from the allegations that respondent communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers, and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump and the Trump campaign in connection with Trump’s failed effort at reelection in 2020. These false statements were made to improperly bolster respondent's narrative that due to widespread voter fraud, victory in the 2020 United States presidential election was stolen from his client.

And there it is again. Giuliani is guilty of nothing more than having an opinion — an opinion, mind you, that doesn’t align with authoritarian states like New York.

Related: Jewish Family Viciously Beaten by Arab-Speaking Family in NYC; Police and DOE Downplay

The ruling determined the following concerning the punishment towards Giuliani:

By order entered June 24, 2021, in accordance with the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) § 1240.9(a)(5), this Court immediately and until further order of the Court suspended respondent from the practice of law, based on uncontroverted evidence that he communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers, and the public at large, which conduct immediately threatened the public interest (Matter of Giuliani, 197 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2021]).

Defense attorneys defend murderers and other criminals, trying to persuade the court of their clients’ innocence despite possibly knowing the contrary. To me, that’s much more egregious than believing something to be wrong with an election.

Whatever you think about the 2020 election, you are ENTITLED to your opinion. You could be verifiably wrong, but that’s doesn’t preclude you from believing whatever it is you think.

This is how our society has become. The establishment builds someone up until they become beloved, only for those same people to come for that person and attempt to destroy them. It’s been this way for a while, but it’s almost at a ‘rinse and repeat’ pace at this point.

 

Follow Us On X