If anyone's wondered what it sounds like to hear two deceptive, egomaniacal, warmongering political plotters inflate new propagandistic trial balloons, they got an example from Hillary Clinton’s latest pop-media-promoted podcast, during which the former presidential candidate asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi whether it's possible that Russia was behind the violence at the U.S. Capitol earlier this month.
"I would love to see his phone records to see whether he was talking to Putin the day the insurgents invaded our Capitol," Clinton said, asking Pelosi: "Do you think we need a 9/11-type commission to investigate and report everything they can pull together and explain what happened?"
Because, first of all, everyone found the 9-11 commission so thorough and reliable.
And to which Pelosi responded, "I don’t know what Putin has on him politically, financially or personally, but what happened last week was a gift to Putin. Because Putin wants to undermine democracy in our country and throughout the world."
This coming from a woman who swears an oath to the Constitution, which is designed to fight the mob-power of “democracy” and establish rules beyond which she and Hillary, and all their ilk in all the parties, are not supposed to pass; a woman who demonized Americans worried that this “democratic vote” of 2020 was fraught with irregularities; a woman who seems blissfully unconcerned about her Congressional colleague, Eric Swalwell (D-CA) enjoying sexual dalliances with a Chinese government spy.
Because, of course, it’s important to push the “Russian collusion” and “Russian Interference” narratives that have proven to be as solid as gelatin.
But regardless of the unsubstantiated, unsupportable nature of the “RUSSSSSSSSIIIIIAAA!” claims, they have proven useful following the Obama Administration’s attempt to overthrow the government of Syria(which has a deal with Russia to build an energy pipeline that could compete with Saudi interests) and said Obama gang became engaged in machinations to overthrow Ukraine in 2013 as a way to isolate more Russian energy exports and solidify Biden’s ties to the new Ukrainian rulers(hence Hunter was placed on the board of Ukraine’s biggest state-run energy corporation: Burisma). And the “RUSSSSSIIIIIIAAAAA!” narrative has proven sufficiently malleable to act as the “reason” for a 2016 DNC info leak (an email deluge that former NSA expert William Binney has proven had to originate INSIDE the DNC, not via slower-data-transfer internet lines and a Russian “hack”)and as a way to portray Donald Trump as a participant in “Russian collusion” to engage in said nonexistent “hack”, that it’s a perfect bogey man to choose for their new narrative of “white supremacist conservatives engaged in an Capitol Coup on January 6.”
Pay no attention to the hens' lack of any evidence to make the claim. It’s time to embark on a great, Quixotic quest to keep the “RUSSSSSIIIIIAAAAHH!” fantasy fueled.
But who needs proof when pushing a convenient narrative that can distract from everything from U.S. militarism to embarrassing DNC data leaks and attack conservatives and peace-advocates in the process?
Who needs proof, when we have Pelosi and Hillary? They can handle truth and discernment for us, while we sheep graze in the sunlight and don’t question the work they conduct to strengthen their propagandistic corral.