Get your bumper sticker now!

There They Go Again: MSNBC Selectively Edits to Smear Conservatives

3.2k views

<p><p class="MsoNormal">At MRC, we’ve <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/08/18/msnbc-no-mention-b…;
MSNBC’s <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matt-vespa/2012/08/29/msnbc-omits-all-cove…;
<a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2012/06/18/msnbc-hypes-minor-…;
of <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/09/28/did-msnbc-edit-an…;
<a href="http://www.mrctv.org/videos/msnbc-edits-ryan-interview-smear-vp-candida…;
to <a href="http://www.mrctv.org/videos/maddow-takes-ryan-interview-answer-out-cont…
conservatives</a> and <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/16/msnbc-edits-obama…
Obama</a>. Well, they’re at it again.&nbsp;
This time dragging out James Carter IV to use tape of Republican
strategist Lee Atwater allegedly claiming Republicans used racial code words as
part of its Southern Strategy.&nbsp; Only one
problem, segments of the Atwater
tape that MSNBC didn’t air show that he wasn’t saying Republicans used racial
code words to win. Instead that Reagan won because he sold economic conservatism
and the South had changed so that an anti-segregationist like Reagan could win
votes in the South.&nbsp; </p>

<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Here’s the transcript of the key part of the Atwater tape via <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/11/14/Left-Media-It-Is-Rac…;

<p style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 16.5pt; vertical-align: baseline; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><span style="font-family: Georgia; color: #111111;">A: It [the South] wasn't ours to win,
it was Carter's to lose. All Carter had to do is run in place. But he didn't do
that...what he did was default...Not on anything to do with racism, or the race
question, but on economics and on national defense...The fact of the matter is,
the South is Reagan's to lose now. And as long as--if Reagan goes and denounces
his own economic policy, or doesn't balance the budget, or, you know--he could
lose the South. But if not, he's going to win the South.&nbsp;</span></p>

<p style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 16.5pt; vertical-align: baseline; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><span style="font-family: Georgia; color: #111111;">Q: But he's not going to lose the South if he goes along with
what the blacks want and the voters want.</span></p>

<p style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 0.0001pt; line-height: 16.5pt; vertical-align: baseline; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><span style="font-family: Georgia; color: #111111;">A: That's--I mean, that should be a thrust of this.&nbsp;In
1968, the whole Southern strategy that [unintelligible] put together the Voting
Rights Act [of 1965] would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now
they don't have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan
to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964, and that's fiscal
conservative, balancing the budget, cutting taxes...</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">By the way, do you think anyone asked Carter about his
namesake’s history of supporting <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/187446/jimmy-carters-race-problem-…;?</p></p>